The so-called "Ground Zero Mosque" controversy brought a lot of Islamophobic feelings of some Americans to the surface. Polls confirm that anti-Muslim or anti-Islam sentiments and mis-information about the religion and it's adherents remains very high. American Muslims have reason to be scared.
At the same time, American Muslims ought to look at themselves and ask some hard questions. The leaders of American Muslim mosques, the mosque-going community and the many un-affiliated American Muslims all have some questions they need to think about and answer honestly. Among those questions are these: (1) Are mosques in America working to serve the communities in which they exist and thereby adding value above and beyond the basic worship services provided? (2) Are mosque leaders investing donor resources into personnel who can serve to train and turn out mosque members for interfaith and bridge-building endeavors? and (3) Are mosque leaders creating a welcoming environment within mosques to bring more American Muslims in the the "organized" religious fold? With some notable exceptions I think the answer to all three of these questions is "no" and therein lies a big reason why Islamophobia continues to grow.
Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times writes in a recent story about the growing malaise among American Muslims:
For nine years after the attacks of Sept. 11, many American Muslims made concerted efforts to build relationships with non-Muslims, to make it clear they abhor terrorism, to educate people about Islam and to participate in interfaith service projects. They took satisfaction in the observations by many scholars that Muslims in America were more successful and assimilated than Muslims in Europe.
How many is the "many" about which Ms. Goodstein writes? There are reportedly 6 million Muslims living in the United States. When Ms. Goodstein says "many" is she speaking of 90% of the American Muslim community? 75%? 50%?
Reflecting on the past 9 years and looking back as far as 16 or 17 years (this is the period of time that I have personally been very active in the American Muslim community and a period of time in my life where I overtly raised my religious beliefs to the forefront of my personal identity) I question the notion that "many" American Muslims have been involved in building relationships with non-Muslims. I actually think that only a very small number of American Muslims have really been actively engaged in building interfaith relationships and actively involved in educating the broader American community about what Muslims truly believe.
This New York Times article quotes Eboo Patel, founder and executive director of Interfaith Youth Core (an interfaith program based in Chicago, Illinois), to reinforce the supposed prevailing sense of American Muslims as being scared about the direction America is going vis-a-vis its views on Muslims and on Islam. Ms. Goodstein quotes a family in Ohio who are disturbed by the heightened levels of Islamophobia in America.
I'm sure Mr. Patel genuinely feels scared about the anti-Muslim sentiments in America. And I empathize with the family featured in Ms. Goodstein's article. Mr. Patel's organization is definitely engaged at the grassroots level working to build greater interfaith cooperation. But his organization is small and it can only do so much. What else is being done to foster tolerance and to nurture understanding between America's various faith traditions?
In this NYT article Ms. Goodstein writes that:
To address what it calls a “growing tide of fear and intolerance,” the Islamic Society of North America plans to convene a summit of Christian, Muslim and Jewish leaders in Washington on Tuesday.
The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) is an valuable resource for all Americans, and their efforts among the religious and political elites is an important component of a what should be a multi-pronged approach to setting the public record straight on who Muslims really are and what Islam really teaches. And while I wish ISNA spoke for the majority of Muslims in America, I don't believe that it does. ISNA does not even speak for most American mosques and only a small fraction of America's Muslim community is mosque affiliated.
Interfaith dialogue and the bridge building cannot come solely via op-eds in newspapers, public service announcements via the internet, and interfaith dinners attended by the same folks from the various faith communities year after year. People at the grassroots level need to be involved in interfaith dialogue and bridge-building as an integral part of their lives. That's the only way to make an appreciable impact.
This is where I take issue with Ms. Goodstein's NYT article: my observations as an active member of the Muslim community suggests that few American Muslims have actually been actively involved in bridge-building and interfaith relations. Here is a list of reasons why I doubt the accuracy of the word "many" in Ms. Goodstein's article:
- Most of the organized interfaith and bridge-building efforts that the media reports on happens at the organized Muslim community level (mosques, organizations like Council on American-Islamic Relations, Muslim Public Affairs Council, Islamic Society of North America, etc);
- Most Muslims in America are not regular members of any mosque or other Muslim institution;
- Many mosques in America are unaware of the need for interfaith dialogue and bridge-building and often misunderstand such efforts and some may, as a result, even shun such activities;
- Muslim leaders heading mosques and other Muslim institutions are ill-equipped to grapple with the strategic challenges facing American Muslims and often act reflexively from one crisis to another rather than engaging in long-term and pro-active engagement;
- Organizations like the Council of American-Islamic Relations have been too successful in defending Islam and Muslims against hatemongers and Islamophobes and in the process have unintentionally engendered a victim-mentality among Muslims; and
- It is very hard to get everyday American Muslims to participate in organized interfaith and bridge-building events in the worst of times (common excuses include being busy with work, with family and having previously set social events).
All of these reasons contribute to keeping the American Muslim masses disengaged from interfaith and bridge-building efforts.
The interfaith activities in the Chicago metropolitan region (the city of Chicago and the 40 to 70 mile radius surrounding it) are attended largely by a well-intentioned fellowship of religious leaders and active laypersons. It's the same Muslims who attend the interfaith events over and over again. Annually the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago holds a Muslim-Catholic interfaith Iftar and almost every year Cardinal Francis George and other key figures from the Northern Illinois Catholic Church attend. Dr. Shakir Moiduddin (a local physician) and Azam Nizamuddin (a lawyer and adjunct professor of Islam) are the CIOGC co-chairs of this effort.
The messages shared at the annual Muslim-Catholic interfaith Iftar that Dr. Moiduddin and Mr. Nizamuddin work very hard to articulate rarely filter down to the local mosques. Besides the dialogue with the Catholic Church, the CIOGC maintains regular dialogue at varying levels regularity and formality with Jews, Methodists, Presbyterians and other faith communities. The problem with those dialogues is the same: the same Muslims are involved year after year and the messages rarely filter down to the mosques.
I currently serve on my mosque's board of directors. For about 1 year I served as the full time executive director of CIOGC where I worked with mosque leaders to get them more involved in the interfaith and bridge-building work (as described above). Getting mosques to commit themselves and their members to participate in interfaith and bridge-building activities was pure torture (there were notable exceptions and those mosques stand out on their own as excellent examples of interfaith communicators - check out the Mosque Foundation in Bridgeview for an example). Most mosque leaders simply wouldn't return phone calls and if I happened to catch someone on the phone or at the mosque I often received a heavily qualified commitment that ultimately wouldn't pan out because one of the many contingencies would inevitably occur and take precedence.
As a mosque "leader" I've had the opportunity to see the deliberations over interfaith and bridge-building in the mosque boardroom. At least in my mosque there is a minority of extremely aggressive and vocal members who espouse strident views towards interacting with non-Muslims. To them any dialogue that is not intended to convert the non-Muslims is not worth the time. Speaking to these folks about nurturing understanding between faith communities and fostering respect are lost on these folks.
Then there are the majority of our board who are in favor of being engaged in interfaith and bridge-building efforts. These folks, however, give the nuts and bolts administration of the mosque priority over other activities and by the time this basic work is done, they retreat back into their private lives to pursue their personal obligations. The result is well-intentioned lip service to interfaith dialogue and bridge-building but very little real action.
There is no (or very limited) understanding of "community organizing" within my mosque so any efforts to support a group like CIOGC translates into a few announcements, an email blast and maybe a phone blast as well to the members. The communications at our mosque are actually fairly comprehensive when compared to the efforts at other mosques. Nonetheless, the act of "announcing" an event is a far cry from really getting people motivated and getting them to turn out.
My colleagues on the mosque board, and our counterparts at other mosques, know how to convince people to get involved. The best example of this is the number of mosques and Islamic schools that exist in the community. Since Muslims do not engage in interest-based transactions (at least on the communal level), the vast majority of Muslim institutions were built with cash. That cash came from the pockets of American Muslims. And they had to be convinced to part with that cash!
This brings me to the issue of strategic thinking. Our mosque leaders today, by and large, come from a generation that sought to build physical structures for the Muslim community. Even today these mosques cajole thousands of American Muslims to donate large sums of money to expand the parking lots adjacent to their mosques and to expand the prayer space within the mosques to accommodate large once a week gatherings for prayer (Friday afternoon congregational prayer).
Hundreds of thousands of dollars are spent on bricks and mortar even today to the mutual exclusion of money being spent on hiring community organizers and program directors and other professionals needed to help develop meaningful community outreach programming. As long as mosques continue to neglect their human resource needs, and instead throw the burden onto the shoulders of volunteer leaders, the problem of getting more American Muslims engaged in interfaith and bridge-building will continue.
Then there is the pervasive victim complex among American Muslims that dissuades many from trying to do something proactive or positive.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is an excellent organization and effectively produces a message that the Islamophobia that is running rampant in America is unacceptable. The message is well crafted and delivered by very bright, very eloquent American Muslims and the message does get on the air quite often (albeit juxtaposed to some vile and rabid Islamophobes).
The problem is that this messaging is also shared broadly with the American Muslim community and it can be damaging to some people's psyche. The idea for broadly disseminating its work is reasonable - it is to educate the community on what efforts are being undertaken on their behalf. Unfortunately, this news can be overwhelming and I've seen it cause otherwise positive thinking and capable people to adopt defeatist mindsets. What can we do in the face of such organized hate, some ask. Others use CAIR as a crutch - CAIR needs to step up and do something, they say.
And CAIR, for its part, is often loathe to be critical of the American Muslim community. In order to stay on message and to avoid criticism from their strongest constituents (American Muslims), CAIR will rarely point out the community's own shortcomings (i.e., the general complacency of the broader American Muslim community) in a public way that reaches the masses.
Lastly, there is the problem of the masses. Despite the portrayal of an organized and nefarious "fifth column" in American society set on subverting America's free society, the truth is that most American Muslims are just as caught up in consumerism-focused lifestyles as any other Americans. As a result, most American Muslims can't be bothered to break away from their regular routines in order to do something positive in the area of interfaith and bridge-building. I know this from years of trying unsuccessfully to bring new people into interfaith and bridge-building efforts that this is the case.
While Ms. Goodstein's NYT article is appreciated for helping to shine more light on the problem of the rabid Islamophobia that is raging in pockets of America today, it overstates the efforts made by American Muslims to find common ground with non-Muslims over the last 9 years. If by "many" efforts at interfaith dialogue and bridge-building Ms. Goodstein means for the word to be understood in relative terms (vis-a-vis the efforts made pre-9/11) then it may be accurate. However, in absolute terms American Muslims have a long ways to go before they can collectively say that they've done a lot in the way of nurturing interfaith dialogue and bridge-building.
Recent Comments